tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6655916971178762059.post5990432285337075979..comments2023-05-28T04:38:47.223+01:00Comments on ashdenizen: flowers on stage: the poppyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6655916971178762059.post-80584467544720144612010-08-18T13:35:26.820+01:002010-08-18T13:35:26.820+01:00Thank you, Franc, for correcting me on the photog...Thank you, Franc, for correcting me on the photographer of Under Glass. I found the photograph here: http://homepage.mac.com/aureliankoch/portfolio/PhotoAlbum16.html, and mistakenly identified Aurelian Koch as the photographer. Apologies to Al Cane who is credited as the photographer for the image in black-and-white which is on the cover of Jacques Lecoq and the British Theatre.Wallace Heimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6655916971178762059.post-65850119121117062792010-08-05T14:17:51.737+01:002010-08-05T14:17:51.737+01:00I'm always fascinated by how performances live...I'm always fascinated by how performances live on in people's memories and seem to be able to seed and grow.<br /><br />Reading this something of the performance comes alive in my memory in a way that it didn't live before. But I don't mean something like: "that's not how I remember it" but more: "I don't remember seeing it quite like that before". Everything you say here feels right, it resonates with my corporeal sense of the event, yet it also deepens and changes my interpretations.<br /><br />Reading this account, thirteen years on, it's as though something living that belonged to the performance bursts through the peeling paper of my memories and interpretations. And I engage with the performance as a different person from the one who watched it in 1997. Thank you<br /><br />And that's how the cover of Jacques Lecoq and the British Theatre should have looked -- full colour. But the photo credit should be Al Cane rather than Aurelien, I thinkFranchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18100772129017138661noreply@blogger.com