In the latest edition of Intelligent Life, I've done an article on to fly or not to fly. Three useful comments have been posted below it.
The first says: isn't going veggie more effective than not flying?
The second says: there's both a practical and a symbolic element to giving up air travel as it's used - conspicuously in the arts - as an indicator of success.
(This comment was from the RSA's Arts and Ecology editor William Shaw. Hat tip: his feature on artists and flying largely underpinned the article I wrote.)
The third says: the market gives people the right to fly, but the pollution created by the flight should be calculated into the ticket price.
On this subject: Costing The Earth examines guilt-free flying. It's often said that aviation contributes 2% of emissions, but new research shows the figure is almost 5%.
What is ‘nature’? Dictionaries urged to include humans in definition
-
Defining nature as separate from people perpetuates troubled relationship
with the natural world, say campaigners
It was last year, during a conference ...
55 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment